I THINK HE WOULD HAVE , I MEAN LOOK AT THAT LIL GIRL I THINK SHE WAS 15/16 AND SHE WAS SEXTEXTING(SP) SHE WAS ARRESTED . I KNOW ITS WAY DIFF IN THIS CASE , PPL ARE JUST SO SICK

Some people dream of angels, I hold them in my arms .  

http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=21729763

http://jerseyjandj.blogspot.com/

This is why i stand by the statment that kids today really shouldnt have cell phones. If they MUST have one, then it should not be picture phones or have that sort of messaging capability. Really, if your kid needs a phone to get in contact with you, it should be the kid safe plan where you control who calls in and who the child can call and be able to call 911. But to send pictures? What child needs that right?

I should say privledge, not right.

i agree Shann, kids should have these phones because they can't handle real phones with picture and text messaging!

but i feel bad for some of these kids because they aren't old enough to drink, gamble or buy cigarettes (not that those are GOOD things, however they are adult things) but they CAN be charged for crimes as adults- why not change the age of minors from 18 to 21? IF the pictures were of his peers it's a completely awful reason to arrest him- and whoever sent those pictures should be fined or arrested as well!

Heyy it's Tiffany, the intern for the Home News Tribune and Momslikeme.com <3

I think 18 is 18. I don't think their grade should have anything to do with it.  After all, there are 20 year olds in high school, they are still adults. 

I think the case may have something to do with him saving the images and possibly distributing them.  I understand it's not a kid's fault if someone sends them a picture unsolicited.  It's quite another matter to store it on the  computer. If he had deleted the images once they hit his inbox he wouldn't be in trouble.